On 18-Apr-07, at 4:26 AM, Erblichs wrote:

Toby Thain,

        I am sure someone will divise a method of subdividing
        the FS and run a background fsck and/or checksums on the
        different file objects or ...  before this becomes a issue. :)

In the meantime I'll just use filesystems that don't feature fsck.

--Toby


        Mitchell Erblich
        -----------------

        

Toby Thain wrote:


It seems that there are other reasons for the Linux kernel folks
for not
liking ZFS.

I certainly don't understand why they ignore it.

How can one have a "Storage and File Systems Workshop" in 2007
without ZFS dominating the agenda??
http://lwn.net/Articles/226351/

That "long fscks" should be a hot topic, given the state of the art,
is just bizarre.

--Toby

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to