Gino writes: > > 6322646 ZFS should gracefully handle all devices > > failing (when writing) > > > > Which is being worked on. Using a redundant > > configuration prevents this > > from happening. > > What do you mean with "redundant"? All our servers has 2 or 4 HBAs, 2 or 4 > fc switches and storage arrays with redundant controllers. > We used only RAID10 zpools but we still had them corrupted. >
"Redundant" from the viewpoint of ZFS. So either zfs mirror of raid-z. The point of the bug is to better handle failures on devices in non-redundant pools. For redundant pools, ZFS is able to self-heal problems as they arise. If you maintain redundancy at the storage level, then it's harder for ZFS to deal with problems. We should still behave better than we do now thus 6322646. Can you post your zpool status output ? -r > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
