On 27/02/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:21:50PM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> Hi Przemol,
>
> I think Casper had a good point bringing up the data integrity
> features when using ZFS for RAID. Big companies do a lot of things
> "just because that's the certified way" that end up biting them in the
> rear. Trusting your SAN arrays is one of them. That all being said,
> the need to do migrations is a very valid concern.
Jason,
I don't claim that SAN/RAID solutions are the best and don't have any
mistakes/failures/problems. But if SAN/RAID is so bad why companies
using them survive ?
I think he was trying to say that people that believe that those
solutions are reliable just because they are based on SAN/RAID
technology and are not aware of the true situation surrounding them.
--
"Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
