Hello Erik, Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 5:47:42 PM, you wrote:
ET> <huge forwards on how bad SANs really are for data integrity removed> ET> The answer is: insufficient data. ET> With modern journalling filesystems, I've never had to fsck anything or ET> run a filesystem repair. Ever. On any of my SAN stuff. I'm not sure if you consider UFS in S10 as a modern journalling filesystem but in case you do: Feb 13 12:03:16 XXXX ufs: [ID 879645 kern.notice] NOTICE: /opt/d1635: unexpected free inode 54305084, run fsck(1M) -o f This file system is on a medium large array (IBM) in a SAN environment. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
