Frank Cusack wrote:
>
> It is ashame (for the consumer) that it's not available without drives.
> Sun has always had an obscene markup on drives.
>
> -frank


To me, hard drives today are as much a commodity item as network cable,
GBICs, NICs, DVD drives, etc.  Sun should not be marking them up at the
rate that they do.  I would be happy to buy a Thumper at whatever
engineering cost they have calculated in for the system without the
drives.  For sun to charge 4-8 times street price for hard drives that
they order just the same as I do from the same manufacturers that I
order from is infuriating.  It doesn't make that much difference on a
two drive x2100, but when you are talking about 48 drives in a thumper,
it makes paying that markup just insane.  I still buy my x2100s without
drives because of the same reason though.  My local Sun service guy out
here hears this from me all the time, and it is probably the only
complaint I really have about Sun.  I pay ~$1k/TB right now for my ZFS
JBOD storage.  It is mostly just bulk storage (user home directories &
the like) and does not require huge bandwidth.  So, when Jonathan
Schwartz decides to sell them without drives, maybe I'll buy a few just
to have a nicely engineered system instead of my cabling mess currently
in the racks.

-Shannon

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to