On 12/4/06, James C. McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you look into your /var/adm/messages file, you should see more than a few seconds' worth of IO retries, indicating that there was a delay before panicing while waiting for the device to return.
My original post contains all the warnings. The first error happened at 20:30:21 and the system paniced at 20:30:21. It makes me wonder if there is something else going here.
Answering your second question, all ZFS pools should be configured with redundancy from ZFS' point of view.
I am sure this is the right answer, but it is not obvious to me how I would do this like I do this with UFS file systems using the SAN as the redundant file backing. Thanks for the feedback. -Doug _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
