Douglas Denny wrote:
> Last Friday, one of our V880s kernel panicked with the following
> message.This is a SAN connected ZFS pool attached to one LUN. From
> this, it appears that the SAN 'disappeared' and then there was a panic
> shortly after.
>
> Am I reading this correctly?
Yes.
> Is this normal behavior for ZFS?
Yes. You have no redundancy (from ZFS' point of view at least),
so ZFS has no option except panicing in order to maintain the
integrity of your data.
> This is a mostly patched Solaris 10 6/06 install. Before patching this
> system we did have a couple of NFS related panics, always on Fridays!
> This is the fourth panic, first time with a ZFS error. There are no
> errors in zpool status.
Without data, it is difficult to suggest what might have caused
your NFS panics.
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris kernel software engineer, system admin and troubleshooter
http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
Find me on LinkedIn @ http://www.linkedin.com/in/jamescmcpherson
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
