On 11/28/06, David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks to me like another example of ZFS noticing and reporting an error that would go quietly by on any other filesystem. And if you're concerned with the integrity of the data, why not use some ZFS redundancy? (I'm guessing you're applying the redundancy further downstream; but, as this situation demonstrates, separating it too far from the checksum verification makes it less useful.)
Well, this error meant that two files on the file system were inaccessible, and one user was completely unable to use IMAP, so I don't know about unnoticeable. How would I use more redundancy? thanks Betsy
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
