Hello Robert,

Sunday, November 5, 2006, 2:12:58 AM, you wrote:

RM> Hello Robert,

RM> Thursday, November 2, 2006, 5:12:37 PM, you wrote:

RM>> Hello zfs-discuss,


RM>> Server: x4500, 2x Opetron 285 (dual-core), 16GB RAM, 48x500GB

RM>> filebench/randomread script, filesize=256GB

RM>> 2 disks for system, 2 disks as hot-spares, atime set to off for a
RM>> pool, cache_bshift set to 8K (2^13), recordsize untouched (default).

RM>> pool: 4x raid-z (5 disks) + 4x raid-z (6 disks) means that one pool
RM>> was created wit 4 raid-z1 groups each with 5 disks and another 4
RM>> raid-z1 groups each with 6 disks.


RM>> 1. pool: 4x raid-z (5 disks) + 4x raid-z (6 disks)
RM>>    (36 disks of usable space)

RM>>    a. nthreads = 1     ~60 ops
RM>>    b. nthreads = 4     ~250 ops
RM>>    c. nthreads = 8     ~520 ops
RM>>    d. nthreads = 128   ~1340 ops

RM>>       1340/8 = 167 ops
RM>>    

RM> Now the same pool config but actual RAID-5 is done using SVM and zfs
RM> just does striping between SVM R5 devices.

RM> with nthreads=128 I get ~3680 ops


it's actually ~4100 ops


-- 
Best regards,
 Robert                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to