"Frank Batschulat (Home)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 01:25:36 +0200, Roch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You tell me ? We have 2 issues
> >
> > can we make 'tar x' over direct attach, safe (fsync)
> > and posix compliant while staying close to current
> > performance characteristics ? In other words do we
> > have the posix leeway to extract files in parallel ?
>
> why fsync(3C) ? it is usually more heavy weight then
> opening the file with O_SYNC - and both provide
> POSIX synchronized file integrity completion.
I believe that I did run tests that show that fsync is better.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
