On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:36:28PM -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > On 10/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> The more I learn about Solaris hardware support, the more I see it as > >> a minefield. > > > > > >I've found this to be true for almost all open source platforms where > >you're trying to use something that hasn't been explicitly used and > >tested by the developers. > > I've been running Linux since kernel 0.99pl13, I think it was, and > have had amazingly little trouble. Whereas I'm now sitting on $2k of > hardware that won't do what I wanted it to do under Solaris, so it's a > bit of a hot-button issue for me right now. I've never had to > consider Linux issues in selecting hardware (in fact I haven't > selected hardware, my linux boxes have all been castoffs originally > purchased to run Windowsx)
Perhaps that's true of most Linux development machines too :)
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
pgpJujKrQNL0n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
