On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:47:51PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: > Hello przemolicc, > > Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 3:54:26 PM, you wrote: > > ppf> Hello, > > ppf> Solaris 10 GA + latest recommended patches: > > ppf> while runing dtrace: > > ppf> bash-3.00# dtrace -n 'io:::start [EMAIL PROTECTED], > ppf> args[2]->fi_pathname] = count();}' > ppf> ... > ppf> vim > ppf> /zones/obsdb3/root/opt/sfw/bin/vim 296 > ppf> tnslsnr <none> 2373 > ppf> fsflush <none> 2952 > ppf> sched <none> 9949 > ppf> ar60run <none> 13590 > ppf> RACUST <none> 39252 > ppf> RAXTRX <none> 39789 > ppf> RAXMTR <none> 40671 > ppf> FNDLIBR <none> 64956 > ppf> oracle <none> 2096052 > > ppf> How can I interpret '<none>' ? Is it possible to get full path (like in > vim) ? > > I guess Oracle is on ZFS.
Ooops ! After your e-mail I realised I should sent it to dtrace-discuss not zfs-discuss ! No ! Oracle is not on zfs. Sorry ! > Well right now IO provider won't work properly with ZFS. > I guess it would be hard to implement IO provider in ZFS - but maybe > not? > > However you can use syscall provider and monitor pread, pwrite, etc. > syscalls. > > -- > Best regards, > Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://milek.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
