Hello Luke, Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 6:18:39 PM, you wrote:
LL> Robert, LL> On 8/8/06 9:11 AM, "Robert Milkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1. UFS, noatime, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 >> 70MB/s >> 2. ZFS, atime=off, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 (the same lun as in #1) >> 87MB/s >> 3. ZFS, atime=off, SW RAID-Z 6 disks, S10U2 >> 130MB/s >> 4. ZFS, atime=off, SW RAID-Z 6 disks, snv_44 >> 133MB/s LL> Well, the UFS results are miserable, but the ZFS results aren't good - I'd LL> expect between 250-350MB/s from a 6-disk RAID5 with read() blocksize from LL> 8kb to 32kb. Well right now I'm testing with single 200MB/s fc link so it's upper limit in this testing. LL> Most of my ZFS experiments have been with RAID10, but there were some LL> massive improvements to seq I/O with the fixes I mentioned - I'd expect that LL> this shows that they aren't in snv44. So where did you get those fixes? -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
