On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:50:20PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: > > Err.. the way you have described that, seems backward to me, and violates > existing expected known solaris behaviour, not to mention logical > separation of filesystems. > zfs should not go changing the permissions on the [presumably] ufs > directory underneath it. Yuck! >
As with the existing code, this would only apply when ZFS was responsible for creating the mountpoint itself. The administrator could change the underlying permissions, or pre-create the directory and ZFS would not modify it. - Eric -- Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
