Anton B. Rang wrote:
I'd filed 6452505 (zfs create should set permissions on underlying mountpoint) 
so that this shouldn't cause problems in the future....


Err.. the way you have described that, seems backward to me, and violates existing expected known solaris behaviour, not to mention logical separation of filesystems. zfs should not go changing the permissions on the [presumably] ufs directory underneath it. Yuck!


how about, "operations on zfs filesystems should ignore permissions of the underlying mount point"?

(although maybe this has to be "fixed" at the vfs level. But if so... Good! it's only about 10 years overdue...)



_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to