> I previously wrote about my scepticism on the claims that zfs selectively
> enables and disables write cache, to improve throughput over the usual
> solaris defaults prior to this point.

I have snv_38 here.  With a zpool thus :

bash-3.1# zpool status
  pool: zfs0
 state: ONLINE
 scrub: scrub completed with 0 errors on Sun Jun 11 16:17:24 2006
config:

        NAME         STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        zfs0         ONLINE       0     0     0
          mirror     ONLINE       0     0     0
            c0t10d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c1t10d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
          mirror     ONLINE       0     0     0
            c0t11d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c1t11d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
          mirror     ONLINE       0     0     0
            c0t12d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c1t12d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
          mirror     ONLINE       0     0     0
            c0t9d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
            c1t9d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
          mirror     ONLINE       0     0     0
            c0t13d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c1t13d0  ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors

Regardless of what abuse I throw at this I never seem to see anything happen
that indicates that cache is being "toggled" on or off.

Furthermore these are all Sun 36G disks.

> I posted my observations that this did not seem to be happening in any
> meaningful way, for my zfs, on build nv33.
>
> I was told, "oh you just need the more modern drivers".
>
> Well, I'm now running S10u2, with
> SUNWzfsr  11.10.0,REV=2006.05.18.01.46

 Its possible that the feature you seek is in snv somewhere and not in that
S10 wos.

 But I am guessing.  We would need to look to the changelogs to see where
that feature was incorporated in the ZFS bits.

 Better yet .. use the source Luke !

Dennis

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to