Darren J Moffat wrote: > James Dickens wrote: > > I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem, > > so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his > > space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or > > take 5000 snapshots its his filesystem, let him. If he wants to > > destroy snapshots, he created them it should be allowed, but he should > > not be allowed to do the same with carol's filesystem. The current > > filesystem management is not fine grained enough to deal with this. Of > > course if we don't assign an owner the filesystem should perform much > > like it does today. > > Yes we do need something like this. > > This is already covered by the following CRs 6280676, 6421209.
That could be done if "zfs" would be based on ksh93... you could simply run it as "profile shell" (pfksh93) and make a profile for that user+ZFS filesystem... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
