Hello James, Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:25:10 PM, you wrote:
JD> On 5/23/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello James, >> >> Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 6:43:11 PM, you wrote: >> >> JD> Hi >> >> JD> I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem, >> JD> so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his >> JD> space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or >> JD> take 5000 snapshots its his filesystem, let him. If he wants to >> JD> destroy snapshots, he created them it should be allowed, but he should >> JD> not be allowed to do the same with carol's filesystem. The current >> JD> filesystem management is not fine grained enough to deal with this. Of >> JD> course if we don't assign an owner the filesystem should perform much >> JD> like it does today. >> >> JD> zfs set owner=joe pool/joe >> >> >> IIRC it's planned - however I'm not sure it a user should be able to >> turn on compression, especially when it's directly turned off by sys >> admin. >> JD> perhaps if compression turned/forced off by the admin then it JD> shouldn't be alowed, but enabling compression on a filesystem that JD> just had it off by default should be allowed but of course this JD> complicates implementation. They could create a system wide config JD> file disallowing compression/encryption etc. Something like 'zfs set compression=user dataset' or instead of 'user' -> 'allow' -- Best regards, Robert mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
