On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Herve Jourdain <herve.jourd...@neuf.fr> wrote: > Hi Trevor, > > I agree with you that VC4 is easier to work with - and can be patched if > there are issues. > But normally you lose the H.264 and MPEG2 HW decoders, and a bunch of audio > codecs, provided by the userland/omx. > Depending on what you're doing, you may or may not notice the difference. But > I'm not sure how well you can handle 1080p30 or 1080p60 in H.264 using only > ffmpeg - if you're using chromium, that's what you should be using I guess. > My personal preference would be to use VC4, and that's what I do most of the > time, but there is still a limitation for the moment, that I just wanted to > point out. > And that's why I think we can't do only VC4, and probably have to keep > userland a while longer. Thanks for clarification - and I agree with you. For me it is not a use case but others have different needs.
Andreas -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
