I found that that’s an issue with rpm packages. I didn't expect there might
be some issue with rpm. If you really don't care which package management
system to use, switch to deb:
PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_deb"
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Diego <diego...@zoho.com> wrote:
> Hi Oleksandr,
>
> In data mercoledì 1 giugno 2016 21:57:32, Oleksandr Poznyak ha scritto:
> > Here is the content of bbappend recipe for base-files recipe:
> >
> > FILESEXTRAPATHS_append := "${THISDIR}/${PN}"
> >
> > SRC_URI += "file://fstab-flash \
> > file://fstab-regular \
> > "
> >
> > PACKAGES += " ${PN}-flash ${PN}-regular"
> > CONFFILES_${PN}-flash = "${CONFFILES_${PN}}"
> > CONFFILES_${PN}-regular = "${CONFFILES_${PN}}"
> >
> > pkg_preinst_${PN}-flash = "${pkg_preinst_${PN}}"
> > pkg_preinst_${PN}-regular = "${pkg_preinst_${PN}}"
> >
> > RREPLACES_${PN}-flash = "${PN}"
> > RPROVIDES_${PN}-flash = "${PN}"
> > RCONFLICTS_${PN}-flash = "${PN}"
> >
> > RREPLACES_${PN}-regular = "${PN}"
> > RPROVIDES_${PN}-regular = "${PN}"
> > RCONFLICTS_${PN}-regular = "${PN}"
> >
> > python populate_packages_prepend() {
> > import shutil
> >
> > packages = ("${PN}-flash", "${PN}-regular")
> > for package in packages:
> > # copy ${PN} content to packages
> > shutil.copytree("${PKGD}", "${PKGDEST}/%s" % package,
> symlinks=True)
> > # replace fstab
> > if package == "${PN}-flash":
> > shutil.copy("${WORKDIR}/fstab-flash",
> > "${PKGDEST}/${PN}-flash/etc/fstab")
> > else:
> > shutil.copy("${WORKDIR}/fstab-regular",
> > "${PKGDEST}/${PN}-regular/etc/fstab")
> > }
> >
> >
> > This will produce two separate packages that will replace base-files
> > package.
> > Moreover, this trick allows You to modify base-files package separately
> for
> > flash-OS and regular-OS
> >
>
> This is very useful, thank you. With this code I'm able to have two
> different
> fstab files under packages-split:
> ./packages-split/base-files-regular/etc/fstab
> ./packages-split/base-files-flash/etc/fstab
>
> Regardless of that though, the resulting rpm packages for
> "base-files-regular"
> and "base-files-flash" have the original fstab as in "base-files", which is
> different to both the fstabs in packages-split mentioned above.
>
> I'm looking at what might be causing this, but any idea is welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Diego
>
>
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
