On 2015-03-09 13:56, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote:
Hi Khem,
On 03/09/2015 09:31 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mar 9, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov <picmas...@mail.bg> wrote:
Hi guys,
I need an advice for the following Yocto use case.
My system has to boot via minimal initramfs and then must use the full
rootfs. I can use 2 separate recipes to generate the 2 images (minimal
initramfs, complete rootfs), but I prefer to create all my build-
products via single bitbake command.
So, is it possible to build these 2 images with 1 recipe, and if "yes"
then how?
Look at how initramfs
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#ref-tasks-bundle_initramfs
and also meta/conf/local.conf.sample.extended
Thanks for answering. INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE doesn't achieve what I
need, instead it merges the kernel image and initramfs in a single
file. What I need is, instead of invoking:
bitbake myproduct-image
bitbake myproduct-initrams-image
to invoke:
bitbake myproduct-combined-image
...which should create 2 separate images.
Just list them both on one command:
bitbake myproduct-image myproduct-initrams-image
If you really want, you could write a recipe myproduct-combined-image
which includes
DEPENDS = "myproduct-image myproduct-initrams-image"
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
