Hi Vladimir, In that case, let's go ahead with "oracle-jse-ejre.inc" rather than removing the "LICENSE" file from oracle-jse.inc.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 10:49:18AM +0000, Vladimir Redzhepov wrote: > Hi Maxin, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Maxin B. John [mailto:maxin.j...@enea.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 11:16 AM > > To: Vladimir Redzhepov > > Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Pavel Shumeika > > Subject: Re: [meta-oracle-java][PATCH] Add support for Java SE Embedded > > > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:58:53PM +0000, Vladimir Redzhepov wrote: > > > >From 783ff400987ec06f41286ffce7e3afc4545d67e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > > 2001 > > > From: Vladimir Redzhepov <vladimir_redzhe...@epam.com> > > > Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 18:13:42 +0300 > > > Subject: [PATCH] Add support for Java SE Embedded > > > > > > LICENSE file removed from LIC_FILES_CHKSUM in oracle-jse.inc > > > because it doesn't exist in ejre. > > > > Can we avoid removing the LICENSE file from oracle-jse.inc ? > Removing the LICENSE could be avoided by overriding LIC_FILES_CHKSUM in > oracle-jse-ejre.inc like this > > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "\ > > file://${WORKDIR}/${JDK_JRE}${PV}_${PV_UPDATE}/COPYRIGHT;md5=be9fe5d47a7dcfb78f142f487afb34bb > \ > > file://${WORKDIR}/${JDK_JRE}${PV}_${PV_UPDATE}/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt;md5=f3a388961d24b8b72d412a079a878cdb > \ > " > In my mind it's better to keep and update all checksums in one place such > oracle-jse.inc which is common for all recipes. Best Regards, Maxin -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
