-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2012 09:40 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:32:27AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 04/03/2012 09:25 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:01:01AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Clear reproducible >>>> testing results. Whether or not a pair of git clones and some >>>> tinkering can result in the same thing as a poky repository >>>> or not isn't relevant in my opinion. I believe that we need a >>>> consistent mode of validating support for a Yocto Project X.Y >>>> release. Now if that is accomplished by building with the >>>> poky repository of the same vintage or by running some script >>>> that pulls the right bits together independently.... I >>>> honestly don't care, but I do think it should be consistent. >>> >>> so teach setup script something like: poky.sh checkout X.Y >>> (which checkouts whatever parts are needed for X.Y) poky.sh >>> update X.Y (dtto) >>> >>> Which creates the same structure like poky repository has, but >>> by checkouting upstream repositories or using submodules or >>> whatever. >>> >>> That's what oebb.sh and SHR makefile does for master/shr HEADs, >>> but can be extended do it for particular version too. >> >> >> This is certainly doable, but it doesn't address the >> stabilization buffer poky provides that I mentioned. > > While I want to reply to your whole email, I want to ask now, is > there really a stabilization buffer being provided? I could see > that being the case if we were talking about depending on something > independent of this effort (gcc, eglibc, make) but we're talking > about oe-core and bitbake. The folks in charge of poky the repo > are in charge of oe-core and bitbake. There might be an > unintentional lag between when Richard can push changes to poky the > repo, but I don't think it's great (and hey, freeing up Richard's > time for other stuff is probably a good thing :)). > I believe there is. It's a small temporal buffer though. I'd be interested in RP's thoughts here. - -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPey5MAAoJEKbMaAwKp364g7oH/RJxQqfOJpCdIz4qaC81hQWt u0SUBpqS4FEUMT5JCgxRztaKsq8+irFTYUODvEDzVTDY8hJJ7rd+QKKnYlgSFT1o vB9qerea1fQZMEAw0J1CmXRCD9tuBN7nMec6Z36KIcJXp0KrAZrSMzgF20byeGTf YjusfkiNOIdVt3q1AtESlQbbAzmiFlvlGxSn4v8hLtXzL36XGyQ//1Lg1mr1ZXvm rqEgN3bA4CdI/tgg6AMjOAI0KnXKj2tWn7o4Gule9pcRycg18XdE+iGZGmSxDdGM +4gE54rwQlrM/2cMM3n0qhzqAyB4o8vnsvPBQyt+DXCy6ErAaqnP25Y31rW7EvY= =MpXf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
