On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the repository format used for poky in yocto project > could also be confusing things. Since it does not clone openembedded-core > or bitbake from upstream locations but maintains a copy of its own. even > though they are ditto copies of upstream it still has logical separation > that can be source of confusion. So if there was a meta-poky that defined > the distro policies and another integration layer that > sources openembedded-core and bitbake meta-poky and other layers > would make it much clearer. > > As such OE-Core is distroless as we all know and can be built standalone > and poky uses most of defaults so meta-poky could be a thin layer on top > right now I think poky combines distro policy layer and integration > layer into one > which could also be source of confusion. I think creating distinct layers > for these two will clear up the air quite a bit.
I agree, and would love to see that happen. -- Christopher Larson _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
