I like the idea, either way sounds good to me. Klaus
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:35:29 AM Jan Stránský wrote: > Hi Anton, > I am ok with YYYY.MM. What about just YY.MM, 16.04, like Ubuntu? > cheers > Jan > > 2016-04-19 22:13 GMT+02:00 Anton Gladky <[email protected]>: > > Dear all, > > > > I am planning to release new Yade version soon, because > > the 1.20.0 was released about 6 months ago and we have > > over 120 commits now. > > > > Some projects now are using the following versioning for > > releases: YYYY.MM (i.e. 2016.04). Do we want to adopt > > such a system? > > > > I think this versioning is better in comparison to our numbering, > > because it includes the information about release time. > > > > Looking forward for your comments. > > > > Best regards > > > > Anton > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
