Dear all, I totally agree with YYYY.MM
regards Alex Von: Yade-dev [mailto:[email protected] ad.net] Im Auftrag von Jerome Duriez Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. April 2016 18:06 An: yade-dev Betreff: Re: [Yade-dev] Yade release, new versioning? This new kind of versioning would definitively sound more meaningful (to me at least). As for the 2 or 4 year digits, assuming Yade will last one century is a far reach ! ;-) Jerome ________________________________ From: Yade-dev [[email protected]] on behalf of Anton Gladky [[email protected]] Sent: April-19-16 2:13 PM To: yade-dev Subject: [Yade-dev] Yade release, new versioning? Dear all, I am planning to release new Yade version soon, because the 1.20.0 was released about 6 months ago and we have over 120 commits now. Some projects now are using the following versioning for releases: YYYY.MM (i.e. 2016.04). Do we want to adopt such a system? I think this versioning is better in comparison to our numbering, because it includes the information about release time. Looking forward for your comments. Best regards Anton
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
