On 7/13/06, Steve Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13/07/06, daniele favara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if i' not wrong ... a logo should be printable and clear on black &
> white ... i guess the logo as it is now is ok.
>
> your improvement could be used for wallpapers and general artwork ..
> but in my opinion the official one shouldn't use shadows or other
> effects.
Feel free to ignore my comments - I'm not involved in Xubuntu at all!
- but I've been following this discussion and thought you might like
an outsider's point of view.
I really like the original logo, I think it fits the whole
keep-it-simple idea of Ubuntu. But I think the new ones, or a
versions of them, would be amazing incorporated as optional
wallpapers, etc.
J. Mak, did you design the original one out of interest?
Actually, I made it. But then xubuntu just started out, the only thing
we knew was that it is for slower machines. But now, we know a bit
more; for instance that xfce 4.4 is turning out to be a real contender
to gnome. It is getting really elegant and more and more people like
it and install xubuntu even on faster machines. But there are other
things to that I think should be reflected in the distro's visual
appearance.
J. Mak
--
http://jozmak.googlepages.com/
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
