A sincere thank you for your concern and support.
On 11/13/2017 01:08 PM, Grundtvig Nielsen Niels wrote:
Glad to hear no-one has been spreading misleading information :-}
N
-----Original Message-----
From: Hussein Shafie [mailto:huss...@xmlmind.com]
Sent: maandag 13 november 2017 12:55
To: Grundtvig Nielsen Niels
Cc: 'xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com'
Subject: Re: [XXE] does this assertion need to be corrected?
On 11/13/2017 12:25 PM, Grundtvig Nielsen Niels wrote:
I don't have any current need to work with the learning and training
specialisations ... but wondered whether this assertion in the DITA
users group deserves qualification or correction?
No.
It's true that XMLmind XML Editor has no support whatsoever for the "Learning and
training elements" DITA specialization. This is clearly stated here:
About DITA support in XMLmind XML Editor
---
Technical content only
XMLmind XML Editor only supports "Technical content elements". This includes machinery
task and the task requirements domain but excludes classification elements . Other vocabularies
such as "Learning and training elements" are not supported.
---
http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/_distrib/doc/dita/about.html
Well, XML Mind and Serna are fine tools, but certainly no where near
as robust as Oxygen (of course, cost being the obvious differential).
Ah, I did assume you had access to oXygen from the reference to it in
your own post.
Also, as I said, they lack support for DITA learning and training
specialization. For one who is more of a writer/designer than a
coder, the more support I can get from a tool, the better.
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support