Barton,
Thanks so much, this is very helpful.
Helen
 
  _____  

From: Barton Wright [mailto:bwri...@streambase.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 1:55 PM
To: Helen Pyle; xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com
Subject: RE: [XXE] (no subject)
 
Helen and all,
 
At my company, version control stores everything that generated a set of
published docs so that the entire doc set could be reproduced exactly, if
that ever became necessary. In our case, that consists of the DocBook XML
source files, the DocBook XSL version that generated the output plus all its
customizations, and all build scripts.
 
Any intermediate file type that was generated during the doc build, such as
FO files, are not stored, on the theory that they can be reconstructed
exactly. 
 
If you are generating your output using XXE's DocBook > Convert Document
menu (or the DITA equivalent), then make sure you keep accurate records,
preferably stored alongside the XML files in version control, of the exact
XXE version that you used. You probably don't need to archive an
installation of XXE itself in version control, or the XSL installed by XXE,
but you might archive the installer for the exact version you used so that
it can be reinstalled. You might also archive your XXE preferences
directory. All that, plus your next question, would allow you to exactly
reproduce your docs.
 
>> . Is there a way to capture just the customizations that I have added
using 
>> 'Change document conversion parameters'?
 
It looks like you can save the current parameter group as a set with a new
name, which can then be loaded into another instance of XXE.  Click
"Parameter Set" to show a menu with Reset, Load, and Save options.
 
 
 
From: xmleditor-support-boun...@xmlmind.com
[mailto:xmleditor-support-boun...@xmlmind.com] On Behalf Of Helen Pyle
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 8:42 AM
To: xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com
Subject: [XXE] (no subject)
 
Hello,
 
I am looking for advice about archiving xml files. These are software
documentation, and we are keeping them in SVN with the software itself.
Should any of the XSL specs be part of that archive?
 
What is the rationale for deciding one way or the other?
 
 
Helen
 
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support

Reply via email to