On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:11:53PM +0200, Nick Wellnhofer wrote: > On 16/09/2015 22:51, Mike Dalessio wrote: > >It appears as though the file > > > > libxslt-1.1.28/doc/tutorial2/libxslt_pipes.c > > > >is GPL licensed. > > > >This file is being distributed in the libxslt source tarball, which is at > >odds > >with libxslt's MIT license. > > The same goes for doc/tutorial/libxslt_tutorial.c which libxslt_pipes.c > claims to be based on. Both files are based on the MIT-licensed xsltproc.c > but there's nothing wrong with that. > > >Any thoughts on what, if anything, should be done about it? > > It's only part of the documentation, so I don't see a problem.
Simplest is to find and ask the authors if they are fine relicencing those, hopefully they see no problem and I will fix this, I tried to contact them, let's see how it goes, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat veill...@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
