On 16/09/2015 22:51, Mike Dalessio wrote:
It appears as though the filelibxslt-1.1.28/doc/tutorial2/libxslt_pipes.c is GPL licensed. This file is being distributed in the libxslt source tarball, which is at odds with libxslt's MIT license.
The same goes for doc/tutorial/libxslt_tutorial.c which libxslt_pipes.c claims to be based on. Both files are based on the MIT-licensed xsltproc.c but there's nothing wrong with that.
Any thoughts on what, if anything, should be done about it?
It's only part of the documentation, so I don't see a problem. Nick _______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
