2012/8/1 Ulrike Fischer <ne...@nililand.de>: > Am Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:17:15 +0100 schrieb Philip TAYLOR: > >> Keith J. Schultz wrote: >> >>> That is probaly teh biggest turn off to LuaTeX. >>> They should some people in as far as coding is concerned. >>> The missing documentation is something I would call a cardinal >>> offense. > >> For something that is free (in the real sense of the word, >> not as some would have us re-define it), can you really complain >> if there is no documentation ? > > I do. Bad work (and a large package without documentation is bad > work) is bad work even if it is free. Nobody force people to offer > their work for free, but if they do they should imho take the critic > as they take the praise. > Who forces you to use someone else's undocumented software? You can write your own well documented software. > > -- > Ulrike Fischer > http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/ > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
-- Zdeněk Wagner http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/ http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
