Quoting Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) (p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk): > > > Peter Dyballa wrote: > > >Yes, maybe it has to be > > > > \def\char\n{\Cher\char\n} > > Simplest is to grab the original meaning of \n before > re-defining it : > > \let \canonicaln = \n > \def \n {whatever, using \canonicaln}
That's not Peter's intention, Phil. If I understand correctly, he wants to construct a loop, where \n contains the loop's counter (and the integer representation of the character to be replaced, if I understand correctly), so he does not want to define \n, but define whatever \n contains. I am still too confused by \expandafter's and \csname's to implement that myself... Hope that helps, Susan -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex