On 21 Oct 2010, at 11:29, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: > > As to why different planes for different languages (or dialects), > there are many reasons, of which (for me) the two most important > are : (1) all characters required for a single language would form > a contiguous cluster within the character set; and (2) any text encoded > using this system would automatically carry with it implicit <language> > (or <language:dialect>) tags for every stretch of text, no matter > how long or how short.
Sorry, Phil, but I don't think such a scheme would be even remotely workable. Aside from the sheer number of such "planes" that would have to be defined and supported (have you browsed http://www.ethnologue.com/ lately? And that's just for the living languages...), it would be utterly impossible to reach any consensus regarding where the dividing lines should be drawn, and we'd have a massive increase in acrimonious political debates regarding linguistic and cultural identity. Unicode may be far from perfect, representing as it does a compromise between many often-conflicting requirements, but it's a more reasonable approach than that. JK -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
