Hi, Peter,
> IMO it looks like some bug somewhere. This could be XeTeX and this could be
> xdvipdfmx. Create, empty page, one XDV file with TL '09 and another one with
> TL '10. By "patching" the XDV files you could disassemble with, for example,
> dvitype, because they are very DVI-sh. (Or send them to me, privately.)
>
> A third option would be to explicitly the '09 and '10 xdvipdfmx' on the XDV
> files and see which produces unwanted output. All obviously find the same
> ITC font.
I already tried 4 possible variants; wrong kerning occured with TL
2010 xetex (and any xdvipdfm). Actually, in the example from previous
letter there was no kerning in boxed {ат} with older xetex, too.
Vadim
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
