Am 12.10.2010 um 14:30 schrieb Vadim Radionov:
xdvipdfmx -vv for both cases
Both logs look OK. You could avoid one annoyance, the use of cmr10, by
adding \pagestyle{empty} or
\thispagestyle{empty} that no page numbers or such are output.
IMO it looks like some bug somewhere. This could be XeTeX and this
could be xdvipdfmx. Create, empty page, one XDV file with TL '09 and
another one with TL '10. By "patching" the XDV files you could
disassemble with, for example, dvitype, because they are very DVI-sh.
(Or send them to me, privately.)
A third option would be to explicitly the '09 and '10 xdvipdfmx' on
the XDV files and see which produces unwanted output. All obviously
find the same ITC font.
--
Greetings
Pete
A lot of people mistake a short memory for a clear conscience.
– Doug Larson
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
