David Perry wrote:
If a font is truly Unicode-compliant, then it should contain the characters I used to test (or the ones you need).
I'm not convinced this statement is true : it is my belief that a font can be "truly Unicode-compliant", yet still contain only a small fraction of the full set of glyphs in the Unicode standard. Lucida Sans Unicode certainly doesn't contain the glyphs you referenced, but after an enormous battle with Microsoft Office I was able to prove that they do indeed exist in Arial Unicode MS. Philip Taylor -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
