Hi Jan,
On 29/01/2021 09:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.01.2021 02:48, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
Julien Grall (3):
xen/ioreq: Make x86's IOREQ related dm-op handling common
xen/mm: Make x86's XENMEM_resource_ioreq_server handling common
arm/ioreq: Introduce arch specific bits for IOREQ/DM features
Oleksandr Tyshchenko (21):
x86/ioreq: Prepare IOREQ feature for making it common
x86/ioreq: Add IOREQ_STATUS_* #define-s and update code for moving
x86/ioreq: Provide out-of-line wrapper for the handle_mmio()
xen/ioreq: Make x86's IOREQ feature common
xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_ioreq_needs_completion() common
xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_mmio_first(last)_byte() common
xen/ioreq: Make x86's hvm_ioreq_(page/vcpu/server) structs common
xen/ioreq: Move x86's ioreq_server to struct domain
xen/ioreq: Move x86's io_completion/io_req fields to struct vcpu
xen/ioreq: Remove "hvm" prefixes from involved function names
xen/ioreq: Use guest_cmpxchg64() instead of cmpxchg()
xen/arm: Call vcpu_ioreq_handle_completion() in check_for_vcpu_work()
xen/mm: Handle properly reference in set_foreign_p2m_entry() on Arm
xen/ioreq: Introduce domain_has_ioreq_server()
xen/dm: Introduce xendevicemodel_set_irq_level DM op
Going through the series I noticed that at least this one is still
lacking acks. I may have overlooked others. Do you have a clear
picture of which acks you still need to hunt for?
I have pinged the tools maintainers to get an ack on the series.
I went through the rest of the series, everything else looks suitably acked.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall