On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:01:32PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:37 PM Elliott Mitchell <ehem+...@m5p.com> wrote: > > Presently I'm using a 5.8 kernel with your patches and haven't seen > > graphical output under Xen with either boot stack. I've confirmed fully > > operational graphics without Xen on Tianocore, I've confirmed operational > > virtual terminals with U-Boot and not Xen. > > > > I had been planning to wait a bit before moving to 5.9, but if that is > > the crucial ingredient I'll move early. > > We're still using 5.4 -- but it seems that the next LTS 5.10 is also > functional. > > I can bet $10 whatever it is -- it is DT related ;-)
Given how many of the pieces I'm assembling are alpha or beta level, I estimate a 50:50 chance on that. Good odds it is device-tree, but good odds I grabbed a bad version of $something. I mostly wanted to know whether I was in completely uncharted territory and needed to wait for others to catch up, versus merely working in a situation where support is funky and I'm at an unknown location in charted territory. I'll be keeping the Tianocore setup available since Xen on ARM really /should/ allow ACPI... -- (\___(\___(\______ --=> 8-) EHM <=-- ______/)___/)___/) \BS ( | ehem+sig...@m5p.com PGP 87145445 | ) / \_CS\ | _____ -O #include <stddisclaimer.h> O- _____ | / _/ 8A19\___\_|_/58D2 7E3D DDF4 7BA6 <-PGP-> 41D1 B375 37D0 8714\_|_/___/5445
