On 31.03.2020 12:05, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Although it is logically a step in the wrong direction overall, it simplifies > the rearranging of cpu_request_microcode() substantially for microcode_fits() > to take struct microcode_header_amd directly, and not require an intermediate > struct microcode_amd pointing at it. > > Make this change (taking time to rename 'mc_amd' to its eventual 'patch' to > reduce the churn in the series), and a later cleanup will make it uniformly > take a struct microcode_patch. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
