> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Sent: 25 September 2019 09:51 > To: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Petre Pircalabu > <ppircal...@bitdefender.com>; Andrew Cooper > <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Anthony Perard <anthony.per...@citrix.com>; > George Dunlap > <george.dun...@citrix.com>; Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@citrix.com>; Roger Pau > Monne > <roger....@citrix.com>; Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babc...@epam.com>; > Stefano Stabellini > <sstabell...@kernel.org>; KonradRzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>; > David Scott > <d...@recoil.org>; Tamas K Lengyel <ta...@tklengyel.com>; Tim (Xen.org) > <t...@xen.org>; Wei Liu > <w...@xen.org> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13 0/4] add per-domain IOMMU control > > On 25.09.2019 10:40, Paul Durrant wrote: > > Ping? I don't think this series is awaiting any more acks. > > I did enumerate the other day on irc what is still missing according > to my records.
Oh, I must have dropped off an missed that. Connectivity can be somewhat flakey here in the office :-( > Would you mind pointing me at a libxl maintainer ack > for patch 1? I think I've managed to spot the missing one for patch 3, > which hung off a "REPOST" thread. And I realize I was wrongly looking > for a tool stack maintainer ack for patch 4, when a libxl one is > sufficient and already there. I thought I'd had an toolstack ack on patch #1 but now that I look again, you're right... it's still missing. I'll chase that one. Thanks, Paul > > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
