On 18.07.2019 16:35, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:28 AM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >> On 18.07.2019 15:47, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >>> I feel like we are going in circles and having the same conversations >>> over and over without really making any headway. You introduced >>> grabbing the broken extra reference in 0502e0adae2. It is and was >>> actually unneeded to start with if the proper solution was put in >>> place, which is what this patch does, reordering things. >> >> I'm not complaining about the changes; I'd merely like the description >> state why they're needed. > > OK. > >>> It's possible there are other instances where this may still be >>> broken. Right now I only have bandwidth to test and fix the paths I >>> use. If that's unacceptable I'm happy to continue development in my >>> private fork and leave things as-is upstream. >> >> Similarly, if there are limitations - fine. But please say so in the >> description, to avoid giving the impression that the issues have been >> taken care of altogether. > > Fair enough.
And btw - if you just sent an updated description, I think I'd commit this without further waiting for George to find time to eventually ack it. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
