Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [PATCH 9/9] libxl_disk: Implement missing timeout
for libxl_cdrom_insert"):
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 06:47:32PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > But I wonder if this could somehow be placed earlier to preserve
> > bisectability.
>
> I think it would be possible to place the patch right after "libxl_disk:
> Cut libxl_cdrom_insert into steps", even though the timeout will never
> get a chance to actually fire. (Before "Use ev_qmp ...", everything is
> synchronous.)
Sounds good to me.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
