Hi Andrew,
On 3/14/19 10:14 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 14/03/2019 10:12, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 3/14/19 7:52 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.03.19 at 18:24, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:
On 13/03/2019 15:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.02.19 at 12:35, <julien.gr...@arm.com> wrote:
--- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
+++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
@@ -2121,9 +2121,9 @@ void init_xenheap_pages(paddr_t ps, paddr_t pe)
* Yuk! Ensure there is a one-page buffer between Xen and
Dom zones, to
* prevent merging of power-of-two blocks across the zone
boundary.
*/
- if ( ps && !is_xen_heap_mfn(paddr_to_pfn(ps)-1) )
+ if ( ps && !is_xen_heap_mfn(_mfn(paddr_to_pfn(ps)-1)) )
ps += PAGE_SIZE;
- if ( !is_xen_heap_mfn(paddr_to_pfn(pe)) )
+ if ( !is_xen_heap_mfn(maddr_to_mfn(pe)) )
Why maddr_to_mfn() here but still paddr_to_pfn() above? Oh,
we don't have any mfn_sub(), I see.
Yes we don't have mfn_sub() (or even gfn_sub()). I only found a
couple of places
where such helpers might be useful. I can introduce the 2 helpers if
you think
it is worth it.
Well, I guess in the end I'm fine either way. It simply struck me
as odd at the first glance that you use maddr_to_mfn() in one
case but not the other.
I wanted to avoid adding mfn_x(...) on the line:
_mfn(mfn_x(maddr_to_mfn(ps)) - 1)
I will look to introduce mfn_sub()/gfn_sub().
You do know that mfn_add(mfn, -1) will DTRT?
It didn't occur to me until you said it. I will use that then.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
