On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 06:09:27PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 05/03/2019 18:02, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:59:42PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 15:46 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > > [...] > >>> Also you mentioned "a node disappears", I thought that was the case you > >>> cared about, hence my suggestion. > >> > >> That's my primary use case, yes. Obviously we should make it do the > >> right thing in the general case while we're thinking about it. I'm > >> inclined to go with Juergen's suggestion of ignoring ENOENT and EACCES > >> (or should that have been EPERM?), yet still aborting for everything > >> else. > >> > > > > I can't seem to find EACCESS in xenstored code, but I do find EPERM. > > Adding EPERM would be fine by me. > > Drop one "S" from EACCESS and you'll see it.
Oh yes. My bad. Wei. > > > Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
