On 05/03/2019 18:02, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:59:42PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 15:46 +0000, Wei Liu wrote: > [...] >>> Also you mentioned "a node disappears", I thought that was the case you >>> cared about, hence my suggestion. >> >> That's my primary use case, yes. Obviously we should make it do the >> right thing in the general case while we're thinking about it. I'm >> inclined to go with Juergen's suggestion of ignoring ENOENT and EACCES >> (or should that have been EPERM?), yet still aborting for everything >> else. >> > > I can't seem to find EACCESS in xenstored code, but I do find EPERM. > Adding EPERM would be fine by me.
Drop one "S" from EACCESS and you'll see it. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
