On 2/12/19 15:14, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 12.02.19 at 15:05, <nmant...@amazon.de> wrote: >> On 2/12/19 14:25, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 08.02.19 at 14:44, <nmant...@amazon.de> wrote: >>>> @@ -4104,6 +4108,12 @@ static int hvmop_set_param( >>>> if ( a.index >= HVM_NR_PARAMS ) >>>> return -EINVAL; >>>> >>>> + /* >>>> + * Make sure the guest controlled value a.index is bounded even during >>>> + * speculative execution. >>>> + */ >>>> + a.index = array_index_nospec(a.index, HVM_NR_PARAMS); >>>> + >>>> d = rcu_lock_domain_by_any_id(a.domid); >>>> if ( d == NULL ) >>>> return -ESRCH; >>>> @@ -4370,6 +4380,12 @@ static int hvmop_get_param( >>>> if ( a.index >= HVM_NR_PARAMS ) >>>> return -EINVAL; >>>> >>>> + /* >>>> + * Make sure the guest controlled value a.index is bounded even during >>>> + * speculative execution. >>>> + */ >>>> + a.index = array_index_nospec(a.index, HVM_NR_PARAMS); >>> ... the usefulness of these two. To make forward progress it may >>> be worthwhile to split off these two changes into a separate patch. >>> If you're fine with this, I could strip these two before committing, >>> in which case the remaining change is >>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> Taking apart the commit is fine with me. I will submit a follow up >> change that does not update the values but fixes the reads. > As pointed out during the v5 discussion, I'm unconvinced that if > you do so the compiler can't re-introduce the issue via CSE. I'd > really like a reliable solution to be determined first.
I cannot give a guarantee what future compilers might do. Furthermore, I do not want to wait until all/most compilers ship with such a controllable guarantee. While I would love to have a reliable solution as well, I'd go with what we can do today for now, and re-iterate once we have something more stable. Best, Norbert > > Jan > > Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH Krausenstr. 38 10117 Berlin Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Schlaeger, Ralf Herbrich Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879 Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel