On 2/4/19 5:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 2/4/19 1:55 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 04 February 2019 11:37
To: [email protected]
Cc: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Andrew
Cooper <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Roger
Pau Monne <[email protected]>; [email protected];
[email protected]; George Dunlap <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] x86/emulate: Move hvmemul_linear_to_phys
Ping, any thoughts on this are appreciated.
Regards,
Alex
On 11.01.2019 17:37, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
This is done so hvmemul_linear_to_phys() can be called from
hvmemul_map_linear_addr()
I have no objection to pure code movement for this purpose. I certainly prefer
it to forward declaration of statics.
Thanks for the reply!
We're also after thoughts on the whole series (replying to this specific
patch instead of the cover letter was an accident).
We expect the second patch to be more controversial and in some need of
detailed scrutiny.
I've taken a look at patch 2 and provided some review comments, sorry
for the delay. Keep in mind we are in the middle of the release
process and most developers and reviewers are busy trying to fix bugs
or reviewing bugfixes.
Very much appreciated!
Thanks,
Razvan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
