On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 2/4/19 1:55 PM, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: 04 February 2019 11:37 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Andrew > > > Cooper <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Roger > > > Pau Monne <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > > [email protected]; George Dunlap <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] x86/emulate: Move hvmemul_linear_to_phys > > > > > > Ping, any thoughts on this are appreciated. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Alex > > > > > > On 11.01.2019 17:37, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > > > > This is done so hvmemul_linear_to_phys() can be called from > > > > hvmemul_map_linear_addr() > > > > > > > > I have no objection to pure code movement for this purpose. I certainly > > prefer it to forward declaration of statics. > Thanks for the reply! > > We're also after thoughts on the whole series (replying to this specific > patch instead of the cover letter was an accident). > > We expect the second patch to be more controversial and in some need of > detailed scrutiny.
I've taken a look at patch 2 and provided some review comments, sorry for the delay. Keep in mind we are in the middle of the release process and most developers and reviewers are busy trying to fix bugs or reviewing bugfixes. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
