On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:32 AM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > >>> On 07.01.19 at 18:28, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On 07/01/2019 08:59, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> @@ -271,6 +297,27 @@ int parse_boolean(const char *name, const char *s, > > const char *e) > >>> return -1; > >>> } > >>> > >>> +int cmdline_strcmp(const char *frag, const char *name) > >> So you've decided to retain the strcmp()-like return type and value, > >> despite them being of no interest to any caller, and it being > >> vanishingly unlikely for a caller to appear which would care. Fine > >> for now, but I'd still like to understand why. > > > > You already asked this, and give no objection to my answer, I presumed > > you were satisfied with the concrete usecase I gave, citing a patch > > needing this behaviour which has already been posted to the list. > > Well, for one I admit I didn't recall this answer of yours. Perhaps > largely because that (to me) was referring to yet to be posted > code, as (obviously) you can't have used cmdline_strcmp() there. > Now that you say this was posted already (with strncmp() > presumably), I can only remind you that ... > > > <bff3c33d-a244-362a-529c-32f91b5f3...@citrix.com> > > ... neither my mail client nor the list archives allow me to search > for such a mail ID.
I prepend "http://marc.info/?i="; to the id in question. For example: marc.info/?i=<bff3c33d-a244-362a-529c-32f91b5f3...@citrix.com> If I need to see more I then search based on the title. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
